Custom AI content agent — Claude-powered, in your voice, at agency scale
A useful content agent is not a ChatGPT prompt with a marketing budget. It is a JSON-output, schema-aware, validation-gated, voice-tuned production system that fits your CMS, your SEO architecture and your editorial standard. We build agents that have written 1,700+ shipped URLs across our own portfolio in three languages — and we ship one for you that does the same.
What our agents do that generic LLM workflows do not
-
JSON output, not prose
Every agent emits a strict JSON schema (title, meta_desc, h1, sections[], faq[], schema_block). The CMS imports it 1:1. No copy-paste, no markdown cleanup, no "regenerate the SEO title" loop.
-
Voice tuning
Voice is captured from your existing best-performing pages: lexical fingerprint, sentence-length distribution, signature constructions, banned phrases. Encoded into a system prompt + few-shot exemplars.
-
Tier-aware logic
Agents respect your tier strategy. A Tier 1 city gets a 1,200-word demographically-aware narrative; a Tier 2 city gets 600 words; a Tier 3 city gets a 200-word noindex stub. The agent does not over-write where Google does not want it.
-
Schema-aware output
Each output declares its schema block (Article, LocalBusiness, FAQPage, Service) with valid @id graph. Schema is validated before the page is allowed to publish.
-
Validation pipeline
Slug deduplication (LIKE %slug%), required-field checks, banned-phrase filters, hallucination flags (claims with numeric assertions are checked against approved sources), markdown stripping. A draft never reaches the live CMS without passing.
-
Cost discipline
Sonnet 4.6 for production runs, Haiku 4.5 for short stubs and validation, with prompt caching. Median per-page cost on our portfolio: $0.04–$0.18.
Where a content agent fits in your stack
Three deployment shapes. We pick one based on volume and editorial workflow.
-
Embedded MVC agent
For PHP/MVC sites we build, the agent runs in-process: a CLI command + cron entry that fills empty page slots, validates output, writes to the page model, and pings IndexNow. This is the model on Holiday Lights Decor.
-
Headless agent + your CMS
For WordPress, Webflow, Shopify, Sanity, Contentful: agent runs on a separate worker, output is pushed via your CMS API. Editorial review fits between draft and publish.
-
Bulk one-shot
For one-time builds (e.g., 500-city expansion), the agent runs to completion in a managed batch — typically 2–5 days for a full state — with QA samples reviewed before publish wave.
Build sequence
Four to eight weeks depending on output complexity, language coverage and CMS integration depth.
-
Week 1
Voice + content model. We capture your voice from top-performing pages, design the JSON output schema, and define the validation rules.
-
Week 2
Prompt engineering. Few-shot exemplars, slot-filled prompts, tier gates, banned-phrase library. Initial agent runs against test corpus.
-
Week 3–4
Pipeline. Output validation, slug dedup, schema validation, CMS integration, IndexNow + Indexing API ping. Cron or CLI orchestration.
-
Week 5–6
QA + tuning. Random-sample editorial review, voice corrections, factual-claim tuning, multi-language pass if applicable.
-
Week 7–8
Handover. Full-volume run, monitoring dashboard, prompt versioning in git, retainer optional.
What clients ask about AI Content Agent (Custom)
Not when the voice tuning is done correctly. Our exemplar-driven prompts encode lexical fingerprint and sentence rhythm of your best human writing. Editorial review on the first 50 outputs typically catches 90% of remaining tells; iteration removes them.
Google's policy is "helpful content, regardless of how it's produced." Penalty risk comes from generic, low-substance generation — exactly what our validation pipeline catches. Our portfolio of agent-generated pages averages 95% Site Health on Semrush.
Yes. We have production agents writing in English, Spanish (AminoCore /pt/articles/ pipeline) and Portuguese with hreflang and translation_of relationships maintained.
You do. All prompts, validation code and CMS integration ship to your repo. We retain no exclusivity. The Claude API account is yours.
Numeric and named-entity claims are constrained to approved-source lookups (Census, GBP, your CRM, your CMS). When a claim cannot be verified, the agent writes around it rather than inventing. The validation step flags any unsupported assertion before publish.
Pairs well with
Ready to scope AI Content Agent (Custom)?
Tell us your goal. One reply, one human, within 24 hours.
Scope a content agent →